Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 13,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm
To go through the papers, the plaintiff had brought them to his get-away trailer parked on rural land near Henry Coe State Park. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
The decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:34 pm
Here's an excerpt: My choice for a notable state constitutional case is Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 11:31 am
Trust the process: Interior promises final rule will streamline tribal trust land acquisitions. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:15 pm
Bureau of Indian Education (Indian Education)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlRobbins v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:38 pm
In Brody v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:37 am
Finally, the state argued that the Court should revisit its holding in Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:45 am
ShareWednesday’s decision in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:08 am
Paragraph 9 of the new code states that “a code right in respect of land may only be conferred on an operator by an agreement between the occupier of the land and the operator”. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:21 am
Yesterday the Court decided CTS Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 10:06 pm
The ordinance in question was the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (“APFO”) requiring land developers to pay impact fees as a condition of obtaining necessary permits for development. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:16 am
Wade and Casey are still the law of the land. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 5:00 am
Reports: Conley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company.” This had not been done. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company.” This had not been done. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am
The majority distinguishes the old Supreme Court Keeton v. [read post]
