Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 2781 - 2800 of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The case was brought by Pom Wonderful, the largest maker in the United States of 100% pomegranate juice and the owner of the 'POM' trade mark, which filed suit for infringement and requested that the defendant to be preliminarily enjoined from selling a pomegranate-flavoured energy drink labelled "pŏm".* Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financingIf your resolution for the New Year is to learn something more about biotech… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
”  This flirts with overturning the 1984 Ohio Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:06 pm
Next will come the motion under Oregon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
” See Robert M Chesney, State Secrets and the Limits of National Security Litigation, 75 George Wash L Rev 1249, 1309-10 (2007). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al. 2013 FC 6Constitutional Law - Federal jurisdiction (s. 91) – Indians and land reserved for Indians – Indian defined The plaintiffs sought declarations that Métis and Non-status Indians were “Indians” within the meaning of the expression “Indians and lands reserved for Indians” in s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867; (b) that the Queen (in right of Canada) owed a fiduciary… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by axd10
The Manageable Nationwide Class: A Choice-of-law Legacy of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]