Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 7:34 am
Case date: 27 December 2024 Case number:No. 23-2855 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:16 am
Case date: 04 October 2024 Case number: No. 22-1817 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:51 pm
See Marks v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
Curry’s marks. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:05 pm
As noted yesterday, CAAF’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 7:01 am
In Attal v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 4:55 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Rule, Preserving Sacred Sites and Property Law, (August 7, 2023).Mark Satta, Commercial Discrimination as Religious Messaging in 303 Creative v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation required… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
