Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 29,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
Milligan: The voting rights challenge centers on the State of Alabama’s redistricting plan, which challengers contend violates the Voting Rights Act by diluting the votes of the state’s Black residents. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am
The second set of cases (Moody v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:45 am
In 1992, despite the fact that the Court was dominated by justices who had been chosen by presidents who had been openly critical of the pro-choice position, these activists had been sorely disappointed by the outcome in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized their importance, describing links as an indispensable part of the Internet in the Crookes v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
But isn't that what this plan in UNC already does? [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:27 pm
The two cases—Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm
Industries v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm
From Freeman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:45 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
Allgemeines Krankenhaus Viersen GmbH (AKV) argues that it does not have extra-territorial effect. ii) Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority– on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 1440 The Judgment will consider where there are successive planning permissions relating to the same site, and the later permissions are for changes to one part of a wider development approved in the original planning permission, is the effect of implementing the later… [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
With impunity from the state, vigilante mobs continue to carry out extrajudicial killings. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:18 am
It would only be relevant when examining novelty, the test for which is cross-sectoral.Though this ruling was sharply criticised by scholars and practitioners (including The IPKat’s post here), the General Court’s approach in fact reflected the one taken in the earlier drafts of the Design Regulation.As Ruhl and Tolkmitt remind us, Member States had planned to use different categories of prior designs for examining novelty and for examining individual character. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 7:30 am
," Chapter in Refuge in a Moving World: Tracing Refugee and Migrant Journeys Across Disciplines (UCL Press, July 2020) - Author = Norway “Migraciones ambientales: marcos normativos y políticas públicas en América Latina y el Caribe,” Chapter in (Re)pensando el vínculo entre migración y crisis: Perspectivas desde América Latina y Europa (CALAS & CLASCO, 2021) - Author = Brazil "Migration… [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
Stanley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 12:41 pm
” The proposed law comes four months after Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Established in Casey v Planned Parenthood, the standard held that if a legal regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking a previable abortion it is unconstitutional. [read post]
