Search for: "State v. R. M. C." Results 2781 - 2800 of 2,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision: (Gowlings), … [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 is a Court of Appeal judgment on an appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
Expansion of Cap-Gap Relief for All F-1 Students With Pending H-1B Petitionsv C. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (The Invent Blog),Brand promise and IP strategy: (IP ThinkTank),Cybersquatters have reached record numbers, says WIPO: (WIPO), (Ars Technica), (IPKat)Global - PatentsForbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz),More on Bessen and Meurer and their book ‘Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers put Innovators at Risk’: (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
” Well, I’m a labor lawyer, and although Section 8(c) basically guarantees the right of employers to speak in a non-coercive way, it does not require states to have to pay for that speech. [read post]