Search for: "State v. Word" Results 2781 - 2800 of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
It is also worth recalling the words of Lord Atkin in Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 at 386: It is precisely because the real damage cannot be ascertained and established that the damages are at large. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:32 pm by Larry Munn
  The Court then went on to state that the Member did not consider that in refusing to register the RED HORSE trademark, Molson was effectively being granted a trademark monopoly over the word HORSE of any colour in relation to beer. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:22 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit got its third consecutive unanimous reversal on Tuesday, when the Court decided its first class action case of the year, Mississippi v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
In other words, if Salesforce is legally compelled to tell Backpage how to run its content moderation function, then Salesforce is being cast into the publisher role. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:05 pm by Rumpole
The title of the post links to a fascinating decision in State v. [read post]