Search for: "States v. State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 258,437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2010, 4:55 am by jrvann
In the recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, Gardner v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:35 am by scanner1
TREASURE STATE TRAILER COURT, LTD, and DENNIS RASMUSSEN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Larry R. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by scanner1
TREASURE STATE TRAILER COURT, LTD., and DENNIS RASMUSSEN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Larry R. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by Scott McKeown
Legislative Intrusion on Article III Courts Considered in Patchek The Supreme Court provided its most up-to-date guidance on the boundaries of Article III jurisdiction relative to acts of Congress in Patchak v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:20 am by traceydennis
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2010 UKSC 54; [2010] WLR (D) 322  ”The only right to recover overpaid social security benefits paid according to an award was that conferred by s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 which provided an exhaustive scheme for dealing with all overpayments made pursuant to benefit awards and applied only where there had been misrepresentation or non-disclosure. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:41 am
EB (Togo) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Very lengthy delay in processing an application for indefinite leave to remain by a National Health Service employee who had returned to the UK despite a deportation order did not invalidate the order. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:37 am
Judicial review not available Regina (F (Mongolia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Judicial review was not available to challenge a refusal by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to grant permission to appeal against an immigration judge's decision. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:37 am by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Mary Ziegler, the abstract of which states: In granting cert in Young v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm by Immigration Prof
The Syracuse Law Review seeks manuscripts that address the constitutionality of laws surrounding immigration and how the Supreme Court’s decision of United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
In this term, the justices will hear two cases involving the privilege: United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]