Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:31 am
Martin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
The ruling in Abdula v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
Taylor (N.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:46 am
The case is Matthew Fulks v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:18 am
Taylor, No. 143603, be held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Vaughn, No. 142627. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:18 am
Maribel Perez
BRONX COUNTYFamily Law
ICPC Applicable, Must Be Complied With Prior To Returning Children to Father Out of State
Matter of Taylor
Subscription Required
KINGS COUNTYPersonal Property
Lessor Has Valid Lien on Rental Equipment Under Lien Law; Motion to Cancel, Discharge Denied
200 Franklin Holding LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:46 pm
Co., 764 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1985) (recognizing the employer/insurer’s compensation lien in a third party suit), Taylor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:33 am
Taylor precedent. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am
Allegations Allegations of overbilling, padding of costs, and billing for unnecessary legal services can constitute a cause of action for breach of contract, provided the allegations do not directly challenge the quality of the attorney’s work (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415,416 [1st Dept 2014]; O’Connor v Blodnick, Abramowitz and Blodnick, 295 AD2d 586,587 [2d Dept 2002] [same]). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
First Woman Prospective Parliamentary Candidate, Helen Taylor, 1885 Janet Smith10. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
Taylor, 154 F .3d 675, 680 (U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
deals with the issues The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd began this week before Moulder J. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
Samson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
See Taylor v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:27 am
The plaintiffs in the Bailey v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
