Search for: "United States v. Dollar" Results 2781 - 2800 of 4,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Peterson and Leibundguth sought a declaratory judgment that the ordinance violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 4 of the Illinois Constitution; a permanent injunction against enforcing the ordinance; one dollar in nominal damages; and costs and attorney’s fees. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by David Oscar Markus
United States also is a reminder of the real people behind the court's cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:00 pm by LawDiva
Grayson, involving a child abducted from the United States to Iceland, where it was held that an airline had no duty of care to a parent in the absence of a special relationship between the airline and the parent. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
The PSC argues that the cost of translation should be considered reasonable cost of doing business in the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by Riana Harvey
Whilst DC had also produced approximate worldwide revenues in US dollars for 2009-2019, it was stated that “the United Kingdom figures will of course be less but nevertheless a notable proportion of the whole…” To this, the Judge agreed with the Hearing Officer’s finding that the witness statement was opinion evidence and that it was unclear what a “notable proportion” of worldwide sales would amount to, due to the lack of underlying… [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Eric
 First, all governments are pro-censorship, and that certainly includes the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
Here is a summary of important cases that have been granted a hearing by the Supreme Court: An abandoned FBI vehicle-tracking device/Wired.com United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]