Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 2781 - 2800 of 7,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by Jason Rantanen
  Although as a practical matter this distinction may be of little value, as pharmaceutical companies often have production facilities located outside the United States, it is something to consider when seeking or opposing litigation under § 156. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:33 pm by Melissa Tatum
United States for the wrongful taking of the Black Hills is sitting untouched in the US treasury decades after that decision was handed down illustrates the latter proposition. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
Of course, additional factors come into play in various situations, but there is no a priori reason to assume in the contemporary United States that members of a racial minority are disadvantaged in the political process with regard to any particular issue. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:39 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Elspeth Berry, The Zone of Interaction Between Partnerships, LLPs and Human Rights in United Kingdom LawSandy Ghandhi, Human Rights and the International Court of Justice The Ahmadou Sadio Diallo CaseElizabeth Wicks, A, B, C v Ireland: Abortion Law under the European Convention on Human RightsStephen Skinner, The Right to Life, Democracy and State Responsibility in ‘Urban Guerilla’ Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber Judgment in Giuliani… [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am by Sasha Volokh
For instance, a state government can't delegate to a church the power to veto the licensing of a bar—that's the doctrine of Larkin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[i] The P3 Health Group litigation was commenced by a minority owner of P3 Health Group Holdings, LLC (“P3”), Hudson Vegas Investments, LLC (“Hudson”), which challenged P3’s de-SPAC merger. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Robert Chesney
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
This is a critical issue because the financial impact to the originating national bank is minor in the case of charged-off credit card debt (which is typically sold for a few cents on the dollar of the charge-off balance) whereas the sale price for loans destined for securitization is at par with face value, or even higher. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
But while a 21 age of majority was common in the United States until the early 1970s, it has now overwhelmingly shifted to 18, and is indeed 18 in Illinois. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Vitale, a trial court decision last year involving the buy-out of a minority shareholder in two closely held C corporations (read here my post on Giaimo); and Chiu v. [read post]