Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 66,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2015, 10:13 am by Matt Belenky
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in Wellness International Network Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:27 am by zshapiro
I’m working on an article on an interesting search and seizure case, out of the First Circuit, United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Crocker “…[the first half of the] Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
Well, the Court granted rehearing on all of those cases (seven on the State's motion and one on its own). [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:53 pm
I joined a group of law professors and public-interest groups that filed an amicus brief Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am by SHG
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Marissa Miller
United States, as well as the continuing responses to Newt Gingrich’s recent criticisms of the Court and the federal judiciary. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am by Matthew Pinsker
Most lynching occurred in the former slave states, but there were cases in the North as well. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
States’ approaches to income taxes vary in other details as well. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am. v ABB Power Generation, 91 NY2d 180, 186 [1997]; see 2138747 Ontario, Inc. v Samsung C & T Corp., 144 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
I think the ruling is so well-constructed and well-cited that it will be easy for the Ninth Circuit to affirm it, just as they did with the Sikhs for Justice ruling. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
Without the marriage equality established by the Obergefell decision, the issue of same-sex marriage would revert back to state law and, in Georgia, the state statutes (as well as the state constitution) prohibit same-sex marriage. [read post]