Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 27,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2023, 8:39 am
The law will take effect on January 1, 2025. [read post]
25 May 2017, 6:14 am
Bross’ main criticism of the EPC framework was that it does not sufficiently respect the necessary separation of powers and does not sufficiently observe democratic rules and responsibilities. [read post]
12 May 2021, 12:47 pm
On March 1, 2019, the employee fractured his fifth toe at home. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:22 am
But how much does all this debt affect your career choices? [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 10:46 am
(625 ILCS 5/1-217) This definition does not specifically address a power-assisted bicycle. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:50 am
Inventiveness of claim 1 of the main request2.1 The appealed decision (section 4) selected as the closest prior art an example of a PTT application residing in a cellular telephone, as acknowledged in the description ([10] and [11]).2.2 However in the board's opinion, the invention as claimed does not relate to PTT communication as such but merely to an input-/output-process. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:00 am
I joined another school in Chicago to maintain status and also got CPT for 20 hours to work. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
… But does it guarantee that business users understand the extent of the intellectual property they are giving away? [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 12:00 am
It does not matter how little a person had to drink. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:00 am
Innovation takes time and often does not happen until the tools to foster it are in place. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:07 pm
As for footnote 1 of Williams, G.S. 20-139.1(b5) was cited because Williams involved a DWI and a fatality. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Senate Bill 276 does two things. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:21 pm
Sept. 20, 2013) are revised as follows: Comments due by October 25, 2013; replies due by November 1, 2013. 2. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 11:11 am
, No. 8:20-cv-1460-T-33AEP, 2020 WL 5016902, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 6:30 am
In some instances a claim reviewer does a physical file review in person. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board found claim 1 to be novel. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:12 am
In the absence of a history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that aegeline, when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of your products, will reasonably be expected to be safe, Oxy Elite Pro and VERSA-1 are adulterated under 21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) and 350b(a) because they contain a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a… [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 2:55 am
The Board drew a distinction between 7(1)(c) and 7(1)(d). [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In this examination appeal case Board 3.3.04 had to deal with a request for correction.Claim 1 of the application as filed read:1. [read post]
