Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
§ 7-11-507(a)), the district court’s “Sentencing Order” does not include a statement to that effect, as required by W.R.Cr.P. 32(b)(1)(E) and Starrett v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:39 pm
§ 1295(a)(1). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
However, it does cast a long shadow over the proceedings. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
District Court Orders $1 Million as Sanctions in Discovery Abuses in Predaxa Drug Lawsuits Federal Case Filed Against U.S. and Canadian Based Companies for Medical Discount Scams Targeting Seniors [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:27 am
No BSA/AML monetary penalty exceeded 1% of a financial institution’s total equity capital in that period. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:44 pm
He kept this up for 38 days, stinging himself three times each on 25 different body parts. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Senate Bill 82 added an aggregate contribution limit of $40,000 per election cycle, which was to take effect January 1, 2015. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:35 am
And I've created this 1-minute video of a sober reenactment of the roundtable: - Broc Romanek [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[xxx] Because this regulation became effective June 1, 2013, very little litigation concerning its provisions has occurred. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
The Court finds that defendant does have standing to challenge the search warrant. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
., to compel arbitration and also sought nearly $1 million in damages. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am
What does this mean? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
Coalition for Peace and Ethics Working Paper No. 1/1 (2014)). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Commissioner, 805 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1986), which explained that the regulations did not define the only conditions that create a substantial risk of forfeiture. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Commissioner, 805 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1986), which explained that the regulations did not define the only conditions that create a substantial risk of forfeiture. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:38 pm
Ziegler (case 1/13). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
§11040, ¶¶1(D), 2(M). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has once again reaffirmed that appellate review of patent claim interpretations is de novo, without deference to the trial court even for factual matters.1 The 6-4 en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:58 am
The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Alaska (1), Arkansas (1), Arizona (22), California (365), Colorado (9), Connecticut (1), Delaware (1), Florida (4), Hawaii (1), Idaho (5), Illinois (1), Kentucky (1), Louisiana (1), Michigan (3), Missouri (5), North Carolina (1), Nevada (10), New Mexico (2), Oregon (10), Puerto Rico (1), Tennessee (1), Texas (10), Utah (4),… [read post]
