Search for: "Does 1 - 47"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
There are five questions of law considered: (1) does section 38, County Courts Act 1984 exclude a gateway (b) defence in all cases? [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
There are five questions of law considered: (1) does section 38, County Courts Act 1984 exclude a gateway (b) defence in all cases? [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
Section 230(c)(1)—not (c)(2)—provides the applicable immunity for content Publication. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission unlawfully reclassified broadband internet-access service as a “telecommunications service” under 47 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
Miguel, 877 So.2d 47, 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
Miguel, 877 So.2d 47, 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
Subsection 14(1) of the Quarantine Act provides, Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
(NIEO ¶ 1).The Wheel has turned indeed; what was dead has been reanimated; an old spirit long thought quite dead has been reborn. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
[70] Section 487.014(1) of the Criminal Code provides that a peace officer does not need a production order “to ask a person to voluntarily provide to the officer documents, data or information that the person is not prohibited by law from disclosing”. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
What does, however, emerge clearly from the opinions are four propositions. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:46 am
For example, Jane Doe creates a film. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
[70] Section 487.014(1) of the Criminal Code provides that a peace officer does not need a production order “to ask a person to voluntarily provide to the officer documents, data or information that the person is not prohibited by law from disclosing”. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Constitution does not recognize a fundamental right to education, which leaves all types of learning, including civic education, without this support (San Antonio ISD v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:40 am
The statute does not apply to an in custody accused. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
The Instructions, it was submitted, are unlawful on the grounds that they violate Article 1 of Protocol 1 (“A1P1”, protection of property) ECHR [2], Article 7 (no punishment without law) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) [3]. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
It does NOT provide a lawful basis for the imposition of reporting restrictions. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm
Narechania tackles precisely same issue - the Supreme Court's scrutiny of "exceptional" patent rules - but he does so using a new methodology, and a new framing for what the Court is up to.1. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
But common law does not define the entire universe of “judge administered” law in the United States.[1]This chapter, provides a brief introduction to the other manifestation of judge administered law--equity. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Under MCLA 213.62(1); MSA 8.265(12)(1), jury procedure in condemnation cases is governed by the same rules as are other civil a [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
Nor, even if the person does not have capacity, is it right to focus on where his parents are ordinarily resident: see paragraphs 44, 47, 50 and 51 of the judgment. [read post]
