Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 37,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
In decision T 315/03 (relating to what has become Rule 28(1)(d) EPC) theBoard fully acknowledged the Administrative Council’s competence to interpretArticle 53(a) EPC by amendment to the Implementing Regulations based onArticle 33(1)(c) EPC without being limited in this regard by an interpretation ofthe Article set forth in earlier case law.10. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Question #10 – General Any update on prevailing wage determinations from the Department of Labor? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 9:15 pm
In other words, your employer does not have to make sure you take your legally-permitted breaks. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
The board also does not consider the document mentioned by the appellant, i.e. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
The board also does not consider the document mentioned by the appellant, i.e. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 10:01 am
10. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:32 pm
Anyone who falls into one of those categories may file a notice of dispute if he or she does not think the will is valid. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #10 It depends. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #10 It depends. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:44 am
9/1/10). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
It encompasses 2,438 pages spanning six volumes, cost somewhere between $1 million and $10 million to produce, and weighs just under 40 pounds. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm
Resources Code, § 21080(b)(1).) [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
But it does not have to, even if the patent proprietor would prefer to keep the proceedings alive.An opposition had been filed on February 3, 2010 by Deutsche Telekom, but two weeks later the opponent withdrew the opposition.The OD informed the patent proprietor of the withdrawal (on March 1) and then invited him to file his observations with respect to the notice of opposition (on March 12).The proprietor filed observations on September 10.On November 25, he was informed… [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm
In reaching his conclusion that section 1(1) was not met, the Judge placed emphasis upon the apology. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am
The appeal further requested rectification of the impugned decision under Article 109(1) EPC and the reimbursement of the appeal fee under Rule 103(1)(a) EPC.IV. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:02 pm
1. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
***The IPKat's DSM Directive SeriesDSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the value gap provision and does the YouTube referral matter? [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
Id. at *1 (text added). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Question #10 My I-485 application has been pending for more than 2 years. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Answer #1 Eligibility does not depend upon your wife’s prior status; it depends upon whether or not you are in a lawful H1B nonimmigrant visa status, and whether you are the recipient of an approved I-140 petition, or else have received an extension of H1B status beyond the 6th year. [read post]
