Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 16,012
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 7:01 am
., the date the specimen was collected); the address of the employee’s place of employment during the 14-day period preceding the test; and the highest number of employees who worked at the employee’s place of employment in the 45-day period preceding the last day the employee worked at each location.[9] These employers must also report the above information for any COVID-19 infections that occurred between July 6 and the effective date of the statute (September 17, 2020) by no later… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Islam, 301 A.D.2d at 345, 751 N.Y.S.2d 449; Brancoveanu v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Further delay in proposed ICO GDPR fine for Marriott”. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
In the circumstances of the case for the reasons that I have discussed, I find that although the matter is finely balanced, it is not appropriate to grant relief from forfeiture in this case, and the claimants’ claim is dismissed. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United StatesBarr v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
It also requires reporting to workers’ compensation claims administrators and has stiff fines for non-compliance. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
Un ejemplo fue Figueroa Ferrer v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:01 am
However, to be a bit serious for a moment . . . all procrastination truly is based on the principle of pain v. pleasure. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:34 am
The Supreme Court has held that “willful” means “a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty” (US v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:36 am
The half-page release was straightforward and did not contain any confusing terms or fine print. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
One case says it's fine, the other case says it's error.After today's Ninth Circuit opinion on habeas, I suspect you'll be seeing a lot less of the claim at closing argument that the presumption of innocence no longer applies. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
Of course, TikTok already paid the largest fine in FTC history for violations of Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm
Filed in 1974, US v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 5:45 am
Abdeljabar v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:22 pm
Hasner), students who schemed with their professors to turn in plagiarized work (United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:12 pm
Leave the guy locked up and you're responsible for basically continuing to take away the life of a frail 74-year old who might well be fine at this point. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:00 pm
(Full disclosure: I’m 65 years old but otherwise in fine health. [read post]
