Search for: "German v. German" Results 2801 - 2820 of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am by Etienne Farnoux
The decision invites a more general reflection, beyond German constitutional law, on the questions of method and legal policy that the apprehension of these marriages gives rise to in private international law. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, PA 45 was invalid and unenforceable under the change-of-purpose clause of Article IV, Sec. 24 (Toth v Callaghan, February 5, 2014, Goldsmith, M). [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:08 pm
Guggenheim Museum over other Holocaust-era artwork, in Schoeps v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:39 pm
The Prussian State Library.Unter den Linden is lined with beautiful buildings, and many of them speak more overtly to the ebb and flow of modern German history. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm by Bill Araiza
From the Religion Clause blog (via my co-author Tom Baker) coms news of Nieto v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
In short, German sex toy company Beate Uhse has been ordered by a Hamburg court to pay German football stars Michael Ballack (Chelsea) and Oliver Kahn (Bayern Munich) 50,000 euros each after it used their names to sell vibrators. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 7:12 pm by Darren O'Donovan
We will be considering this in the coming days, though at this point it is important to note that a challenge to the European Stabilisation Fund is already making its way through to the German Constitutional Court based on both Article 122 of the Treaty of the European Union and the German Constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 3:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
  Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc v City of Albany, 2015 WL 4067066 (NDNY 7/2/2015)Filed under: ADA, Current Caselaw - New York, Fair Housing Act Amendments [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:32 am by charonqc
I bring you news that the Germans do not like the VUVUZELA. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
In April, Emperor Charles V called upon Luther to appear before the Imperial Diet of Worms where his works and views were publicly denounced. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Philipp Widera
Based on the Pemetrexed-decision of the German Federal Supreme Court (docket-no X ZR 29/15, also known as Actavis v Eli Lilly), the Court of Appeal made it clear that Swiss-type claims are to be treated in the same way as so-called EPC 2000-claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Kenety V, with assistance from Frank Ledda, Senior Chief Counsel in the Detroit Office of the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:30 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
.* The German Government filed its objection on August 31, 2009, claiming that the Authors’ Guild did not represent the interests of German authors, publishers, digital libraries or citizens. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:07 am
On 14 May 2009, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-180/06 (Renate Ilsinger v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:18 am by Scott A. McKeown
(also noting that the appropriate PCT form box was NOT checked carrying over amendments from the earlier, German prosecution). [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Florian Mueller
Either one wants to argue that indirectly-imposed costs count, or one doesn't.Expect more posts on FTC v. [read post]