Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 2801 - 2820 of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 7:16 am by INFORRM
 In a judgment given by Lord Thomas CJ, Guardian News And Media Ltd & Ors v R. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:26 pm by Simon Gibbs
This will apply to all cases where judgement is given after 1 April 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 3:54 pm
One of the ways I'm approaching this is to look at the 'advice' given in non-legal sources to wannabe bloggers, podcasters and such. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:44 pm by NL
Heartpride Ltd v Sawhney (2011) Ch D 12/5/2011 [Note on Lawtel, not elsewhere] A case on notices of rent increase for a Rent Act tenancy given under Rent Act 1977 s.45(3). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:05 pm by John Chierichella
It is a given that companies strive to protect their intellectual property. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:44 am by Paul
Given that the word "perpetual" can be defined to mean "eternal; permanent; lasting for eternity" it is certainly arguable that a perpetual licence should last forever, but in the recent case of BMS Computer Solutions Limited v AB Agri Limited [2010] EWHC 464 (Ch) it was held that a perpetual software licence was merely a licence "of indefinite duration" and could be terminated in accordance with other provisions of the relevant licence… [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:44 pm by NL
Heartpride Ltd v Sawhney (2011) Ch D 12/5/2011 [Note on Lawtel, not elsewhere] A case on notices of rent increase for a Rent Act tenancy given under Rent Act 1977 s.45(3). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Stanford student Anthony Dick summarizes Monday’s argument in Horne v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm by Stephen Griffin
Because I am teaching a course this fall on the fourteenth amendment, I’ve been meaning to post on the upcoming big case, Fisher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Analogy with Arrow case unhelpful given factual differences between the caseMichael agreed that there are key differences between the facts of Arrow v Merck and the present case - an observation also made by Carr J in his judgment when he sounded a note of caution on the use of the term "Arrow" declarations. [read post]