Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 2801 - 2820 of 104,916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
”Because it thought “’substantial justice’” would “best be rendered by a prompt trial,” where the City could raise its defenses to PP’s claims, the AT1 reinstated the dispute.That will likely be trying.# # #DECISIONP. v City of New York [read post]
In 2024,  the division bench comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, delivered a significant judgment in the case of Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
In both cases, the federal appeals court deferred to the agency, holding that the rule is a permissible exercise of the agency’s authority In granting certiorari, the justices have specifically agreed to decide the following question: “Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
 And privacy injunctions seemed to be making a slow comeback … In 2016 the mini-revival of the privacy injunction continued, notably with PJS v News Group in the Supreme Court (our post on the Court of Appeal decision granting the injunction is now our most popular of all time). [read post]