Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 2801 - 2820 of 3,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2010, 6:33 am
My good friend Mike Maslanka has an excellent post up on his Work Matters Blog this week discussing the Texas Supreme Court's granting review of  Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 522 F.3d 1299, 1306 (Fed. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Kentucky and oral argument in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:15 am by gmlevine
MG USA, D2010-0046 (WIPO March 22, 2010) leaves no doubt of his view about the Respondent’s conduct, but was constrained by the terms and precedent of UDRP to rule in its favor. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
  Sahar Aziz of ACSBlog expressed hope that the Court would use Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:06 am by Anna Christensen
At USA Today, Joan Biskupic covers another of this week’s rulings, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
Teva Pharm., USA, Inc., 429 F.3d 1364, 1377 (Fed. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
As Joan Biskupic reports for USA TODAY, “Congress amended the disputed provision [of the False Claims Act] as part of the health care overhaul that became law March 23. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:37 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
This case might be an aberration due to the lack of diplomatic relations with Iran, but an important case for practitioners to review.In USA v Banki, S.D. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports that the Justices did not appear swayed by the arguments of a death row inmate appealing his sentence in Magwood v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:53 am
However, defendant failed to demonstrate as a matter of law that plaintiffs' proof of loss was fraudulent (see Saks & Co. v Continental Ins. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
The National Law Journal’s Tresa Baldas has a story on Kasten v. [read post]