Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 2801 - 2820 of 3,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
We disagree and affirm the judgment of the district court. 08a0320p.06 2008/08/26 James Stewart Hamilton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 1:47 am
  As I have said before, I am so very proud to now represent Lett is (along with Douglas Cole of Jones Day), and we have a cert petition still pending before the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
"Even assuming the district court erred, ... absent an opinion by this circuit or the Supreme Court on the issue in dispute, there is no plain error unless [the] district court failed to follow [an] ‘absolutely clear' legal norm.... [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:58 am
  The court thus extended the rationale of Copperweld Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Our guest blogger, Sean Costello of Jones Day, opined that Judge Easterbrook of the Seventh Circuit solved this riddle in Spivey v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:12 am
  According to the court computers, Mr. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:25 pm
The personal injury suit against Cheryl K Inc. was filed in the Galveston County 212th District Court on July 25. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
L. 77 (1791), to become widely accepted in American courts by the middle of the 19th century, see, e.g., Day v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Super. 1995) (ruling manual inadmissible).Informal agency policies - Jones v. [read post]