Search for: "Land v. State"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 13,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
Today we take a brief look at a couple of interesting employment law cases from the last two weeks: Anderson v London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority shows us how not to draft a pay review clause, and HM Land Registry v McGlue looks at when aggravated damages in discrimination cases might be appropriate.Beware of unclear pay clauses The case of Anderson v London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority acts as a stark warning for employers when… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:01 am
Northeastern Land Servs. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:58 am
Northeastern Land Servs. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
City of Hamlet, 879 F.2d 473, 476 (9th Cir. 1988); United States v. 33.5 Acres of Land, 789 F.2d 1396, 1400 (9th Cir. 1986). [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 2:55 pm
In Rahofy v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:40 am
This is not the dam we're talking about.TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm
A joint EIS/EIR (EIR) was prepared by federal lead agency Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the United States Forest Service (USFS), and state lead agency Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (Air District). [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:08 am
Paragraph 9 of the new code states that “a code right in respect of land may only be conferred on an operator by an agreement between the occupier of the land and the operator”. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
See State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm
Khouri (Indian Taxation; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Mineral Royalties; State Intervention) Alturas Indian Rancheria v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
It turns out that there is an ancient rule, dating to an 1872 case called United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:19 am
This ruling revives the plaintiff's state law claim even as it brings her federal equal pay claim to an end.The case is Eisenhauer v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:28 pm
The split-panel Circuit Court decision in Friends of Alaska Nat’l Wildlife Refuges v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm
Lemon v. [read post]
Tanner Allread on SCOTUS’ Improper Use of Indian Removal Era Analysis in Modern Day Indian Law Cases
4 Nov 2023, 8:43 am
PDF Abstract: In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]
