Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 88,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
* §§17 and 18 of the Public Officers Law respectively address providing State officers and employees and officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out an act or omission involving the performance of official duties. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
* §§17 and 18 of the Public Officers Law address providing State officers and employees and officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out an act or omission involving the performance of official duties. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch client Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce offered the following statements today regarding the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” legislation crafted by Pearce to penalize Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
United States decision to its early en banc decision in Eli Shifa v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiff [*7]goes on to state that Mr. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
A previous opinion, State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:08 am
Legal malpractice issues, and definitely attorney-client privilege issues arise in Estates. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:20 pm
Warrior Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:45 am
Marshak v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
And if a stated reason includes a legally erroneous provision, that, by definition, constitutes and abuse of discretion. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:05 pm
Back in February, I noted a provision tucked away in last year’s National Defense Authorization Act: Section 1039, which obligated the Administration to study and report back to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on “the legal rights, if any, for which an individual detained at Guantanamo … if transferred to the United States, may become eligible, by reason of such transfer. [read post]
23 Feb 2005, 12:01 am
In the first case, Orff v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:52 pm
A year after the Supreme Court decision in United States v Windsor, federal agencies have been issuing rules that affect same sex couples regarding programs like Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, Medicare, and Medicaid. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 2:50 am
Boerger v. [read post]
3 Nov 2004, 1:00 am
In the first, Small v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
STATE V. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 2:41 am
Here, in Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am
In this case, the court permits client to plead fraud even though legall malpractice is time barred. [read post]
