Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
The guest speaker will be Lord Justice Robert "Robin" Jacob, Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
As evidence of this trend, read of some of the posts linked to below, showing how judges are approaching security issues now, and then read this passage from Lord Denning in the 1977 case of R v SSHD ex p Hosenball [1977] 1 WLR 766 at 783: There is a conflict between the interests of national security on the one hand and the freedom of the individual on the other. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
In Glarum v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:53 pm
In this connection principles which have been laid down by Lord Sumner in Surajmull Nagoremull v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
The guest speaker will be Lord Justice Robert "Robin" Jacob, Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Little over four years later the House of Lords handed down the oft-cited and widely commented upon judgment in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘A’) holding that the power was incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
" Turning to the authorities, Mr Justice Moylan stated (at paragraph 61): "My task is to determine "the division of property which best achieves the fair overall outcome": Charman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
In Salem Advocate Bar Association v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
In the Canadian case of Manson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
The Dutch court also decided in favour of attribution to the sending state. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
In the Facebook juror case, Joanne Fraill was jailed for eight months (A-G v Fraill [2011] EWCA Crim 1570). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm
Her Honour quoted Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon [1990] 1 Ch 65 at 81 (CA), where Lord Donaldson of Lymington MR referred to the possibility of barring the right to defend of a defendant with no assets within the jurisdiction who breaches a Mareva injunction freezing those assets. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am
In the courts: The Queen v Stephen Carter David Beswick Linda Mary Boyd Michael Gillespie-Doyle ??? [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:05 pm
I am hardly in a position to dispute Professor Leiter's evaluation of the quality of my scholarship, both because I haven't seen it, and because, as I believe Freidrich Nietzsche observed (or perhaps it was Lord Coke), no man should be a judge in his own case. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm
Commissioner of Stamps (Lord Watson); Mahalakshmi Oil Mills v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
In 1982 in a case called R. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]