Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 5,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
First, infringement and invalidity are separate matters under patent law. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
[Why would ability to circumvent matter there? [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
A: 110(2) by the way: very difficult for us in digital education space: mediated instruction activities that use work as integral part of class experience under control of instructor analogous to type of performance that would take place live—really problematic b/c the key learning activities are not the type that would happen live. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am
Blu-Ray = progressive scan, not interlaced, so as you scrub through you always get a clean frame no matter where you stop, never have an interlacing issue. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Charlesworth: b/c of how the law is written, we have to consider these issues. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Green: yes, b/c we believed it was necessary. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:00 am
§ 204.5(j()2) for at least one year immediately preceding the petition. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Despite the agency’s diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm
However this is dangerous territory, for it begs the question of how reliable any trial process based upon oral testimony can ever be (don’t go there – but see some of Mostyn J’s speeches). [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
`Because the existence of defamatory content is a matter of law, a reviewing court can, and must, conduct a context-driven assessment of the alleged defamatory statement and reach an independent conclusion about the statement's susceptibility to a defamatory interpretation. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 am
An interview with Nicholas B. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:19 pm
Initially, we disagree with the Supreme Court's conclusion that the mother defaulted on the petition (see CPLR 321; Matter of Kindra B., 296 AD2d 456 [2002]; Matter of Tyrell M., 283 AD2d 500 [2001]). [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am
B pleaded guilty to a number of offences. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:57 pm
However, the court failed to set forth the statutory factors considered in determining the respective equitable distribution rights of the parties and the reasons for its decision (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5][g]; Annis v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Person B does nothing, but six months later files a criminal complaint. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
It is worth recalling exactly what Eady J said: “A search engine, however, is a different kind of Internet intermediary. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Jörg Pirrung, Brussels IIbis Regulation and Child Abduction: Stones Instead of Bread ? [read post]
