Search for: "MATTER OF MOORE"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 3,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
“When considering an equal protection challenge in criminal matters,individuals are ‘similarly situated’ only if they are charged with the samecrime or crimes. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:30 am
Lynne Wrennall (incorrectly spelt 'Rennall' in the video) of Liverpool John Moores University. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 1:58 am
The Ancillary Actuary is a blog by "actuarial and administrative professional services firm" Bradshaw, Dixon and Moore, and "is intended to encourage an exchange of ideas and promote debate about the financial issues that arise in a relationship breakdown". [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:56 am
Most of the old rules won't apply anymore, while some will matter more [...] [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
In other words, in the plain but effective words of Justice Moore, “[a] ‘show-off’ or a ‘strutter’ will be just that whether a camera is present or not. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 8:44 pm
Revenue has historically opposed the use of 1031 exchanges, arguing that personal use and enjoyment negates the investment property requirements of section 1031.The IRS position was most recently successful in a tax court case titled "Moore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 28, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:55 am
According to Judge Karen Nelson Moore, writing for the panel: This case requires us to consider whether COGSA or the Hague-Visby Rules or both apply as a matter of law to the ocean [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Moore, 213 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir. 1954); Preston v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:50 pm
Star included the text:"We know the rules of usage are much looser online, particularly in the world of bloggers," Moore said in the Star article. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:The European call for copyright extension for performers: (John Carroll), (The IP Factor), (Spicy IP), (Public Knowledge), (IPR-Helpdesk), (Techdirt), (Innovationpartners),Full CAFC to reexamine the scope of subject matter patentability for business methods, also to consider whether it is appropriate to reconsider or overrule State Street Bank… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:45 pm
Whether a judge is a Democrat or a Republican should not matter; the position should be above such petty considerations. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 6:14 am
Superior Court Judge Steven Fleece, in a statement, said the judges also were glad to have the matter settled and "look forward to a cooperative relationship in the future. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:34 pm
Moore v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:18 am
For the stirrings of that debate, see Professor Nancy Moore's forthcoming article in the DePaul Law Review, which aims a broadside at the Discussion Draft.We'll leave the law review commentary to the scholars, but we have a few bloggers' technical issues to pose here:First, should it really matter if "the settlement distinguishes among different categories of claimants"? [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:30 am
t apply anymore, while some will matter more than ever. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:16 pm
Most of the old rules won't apply anymore, while some will matter more than ever. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
Moore, 2008 U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
In the original case, the CAFC (Judges Moore and Gajarsa) found that a transitory propagating signal is not proper patentable subject matter because it does not fit within any of the four statutory categories. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 12:27 pm
Chain letters, judicial scandal and Chinese politics are just a few of the matters highlighted in today's abridged post. [read post]
