Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 3,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
The Court in Nanaimo (City) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989). [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
In the past five years alone, we’ve watched the introduction of the tablet, the worldwide revolution in social media, the creation of an “app” economy, and the expansion of the Android operating system as the majority choice for mobile applications. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 1571, 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1141, 1143 (Fed. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
Session 3: Licensing IModerator: Yonathan ArbelJonathan M. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
With all the major news events of the last week, one important storyline may be going unnoticed. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
This article discusses the implications of GINA on professional sports: specifically, part II of the articles discusses GINA in detail, part III discusses GINA’s impact on professional sports, part IV discusses GINA’s economic impact on professional sports, and part V provides some concluding remarks. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Smith of Orlando, Florida, is no admirer of the patent system. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:59 pm
In any case, the fact that the majority of Sen’s books were published in the previous century makes this premature or living “canonization” a bit silly (a social scientific or cultural variation on the ‘great man’ theory?). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
Copyright needs a radical fix that embraces the digital world and pays as much attention to users and creators as to the economic and political interests which have so far been mostly favoured": Graham Smith (Bird & Bird LLP partner and Cyberleagle blogger). [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Furthermore, if, following the opinion, we admit that the Member States are under an obligation (of loyal cooperation) to ratify the UPC Agreement, this Agreement, which contains the major rules defining patent protection and instituting a new court and its rules of jurisdiction, would not have been subject to any form of decision by neither the European Parliament nor the national parliaments. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
In this post I want to run through some of the major cases that support this argument, and then consider the two major precedents that have been asserted against my position. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:36 pm
Bank v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Vast majority of cases fall out before that. [read post]
