Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2801 - 2820
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 2:31 pm
Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Marie Claire Album, S.A. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:21 pm
Charmaine V. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:21 pm
Charmaine V. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Motorola, Inc. and TCL v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
"Abortion, death penalty wins slow in coming on state-by-state basis," is Mark Pattison's report via Baltimore's Catholic Review.If Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
Iancu v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:35 am
Board-Tech Electronic Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:21 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 3:28 am
Instagram, LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its long-awaited ruling in the case of Google v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is about a business that got a bunch of trade marks covering the somewhat unregistrable word "supreme", and then decided to bring proceedings against a defendant who wasn't using the word as a trade mark and whose use of it went back 20 years, recounts Jeremy.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on… [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
Robert Barnes covered the argument for The Washington Post, as did Mark Sherman and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press. [read post]
