Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 10,567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2019, 4:01 am
It doesn’t matter that Trump is the only president in generations not to disclose his tax returns before being elected, or that his excuse for refusing to do so is similarly malarkey. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:23 pm
In the wake of Thursday’s ruling, it wasn’t immediately clear what the government planned to do. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm
First, the history of this matter is relevant to our determination of the propriety of sanctions. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
Justice Roberts also wrote separately. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
The Court couldn’t change that constitutional text. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
And, also in 2018, consider the biggest headline grabber, the so-called “Travel Ban” case: there is no doubt that the executive branch can, as a general matter, subject people who come to the U.S. from different countries to different levels of security screening; the issue was whether the federal government’s actions were motivated in this instance by hostility to Muslims.When we pull the focus back even wider to include the biggest legal (though non-judicial) news story… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 7:04 pm
It's so unfair... as a legal matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:27 am
Now the Roberts family is facing a huge medical bill and has no way to recover the damages from their bankrupt former employer. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:14 am
Nextpoint has allowed us to give our clients predictable pricing, because we know upfront that it doesn’t matter how many gigabytes of data the client has. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:14 am
Nextpoint has allowed us to give our clients predictable pricing, because we know upfront that it doesn’t matter how many gigabytes of data the client has. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am
Justice Gorsuch wrote for a six-member majority of the Court (he was joined by Justices, Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Kagan). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 2:43 pm
Roberts and Kagan cover many of them in their respective opinions. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Why wouldn’t one prefer legal fidelity if there were no side costs? [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Mom’s viral post reminds us that social media isn’t real: “Mamas, don’t compare yourself. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:09 pm
In the court’s words, “[t]he only provision in the Constitution that specifically addresses the matter assigns it to the political branches. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Jubelirer four justices had already tired of this fishing expedition, and were clearly prepared to declare the matter nonjusticiable. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:08 am
” Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, and John Roberts partly dissented over concerns that striking the prohibition of the registration of “scandalous” matter would require the government to register marks so obscene and/or hateful that they could incite a violent reaction. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Daniel Twetten, Pro Hac Vice, Loevy & Loevy, Boulder Colorado, for Appellant David Ayres Robert M. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:13 am
As a practical matter, a majority of the Supreme Court stood firm against the contrivance and shenanigans of an administration that can’t keep its lies straight. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
” The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal asserts that “[t]he majority opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts is a notable example of judicial restraint, and over the long run it will protect the High Court’s credibility. [read post]
