Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 4:03 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
According to its paras 2 and 3, decisions as to the validity of an arbitration agreement are excluded from the provisions on recognition and enforcement, while decisions as to the substance of the dispute are subject to these provisions unless this would require a member state to violate its obligations (i.e. to enforce a valid arbitral award) under the New York Convention. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
" (Petition ¶ 31). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
One of the important rationales for self-regulation is the importance of independence from the state. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:37 am
" Order ¶29 (quoting Smith v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
In reaching this conclusion, we have regard to the aim of the Directive as evidenced by the recitals in the preamble and article 1 (see paras 56 and 57 above). 77. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
É para a formação dessa relação triádica interior do eu com o eu que devemos considerar com mais cuidado. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
State/UT-wise trends: An individual convicted of one or more crimes inviting a sentence of death was more likely to be so punished in the State of Uttar Pradesh. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
In today’s case (Hendry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Coalition for a Sustainable Future In Yucaipa v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:01 am
Todo comenzó con el caso SC09-332 – State of Florida v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:26 pm
When you last heard about London Leasing LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
Unlike the racially motivated beating in [Wisconsin v.] [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:12 am
The case is captioned Cronin & Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
If you are interested, you can find the Manual for Courts-Martial – United States, here. [read post]
