Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
A horrible set of facts confronted the First Department yesterday in People v Dickerson, 2007 NY Slip Op 04718 where the Court had to decide whether the starvation constituted depraved indifference murder, or criminally negligent homicide. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 am
In McMillin v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 2:49 pm
On the fortieth anniversary of the Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm
Pets are not people. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
Davis v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
And Letter assured the justices that there are limits on the House’s ability to issue subpoenas. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:58 pm
" And the Bill of Rights states: Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,… [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
The case, McKenna v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
It began its analysis of this issue by explaining that theFourth Amendment provides that `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:58 pm
" Guedes v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 6:14 am
The recent judgments of the House of Lords in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186 point to the urgent need for the courts to set aside the preposterous contention that it is 'substantially uncontestable' that substantial harm to the public would arise if prenuptial agreements were enforceable. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm
There have been 8 Congressional hearings in the House and the Senate since December 2005 regarding issues of cruise passenger safety. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
They saw no other cars or people except Mr. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:05 am
Supreme Court held in its 2020 opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:58 pm
State of Mississippi v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
The lyrics start: “People are talkin’, talkin’ ’bout people, I hear them whisper, you won’t believe it. [read post]
21 May 2007, 5:08 pm
People sometimes asked what did I do with all the money, having a salary for the first time and no expenses. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
In Nijhawan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:37 am
In Houseman v. [read post]
