Search for: "People v. House" Results 2801 - 2820 of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm by Donald Thompson
”IMAGING DEVICE means any mechanical, digital or electronic viewing device, camera or any other instrument capable of recording, storing or transmitting visual images that can be utilized to observe a person (Penal Law § 250.40[2]).SURREPTITIOUSLY means that the act was done stealthily or secretively (People v Piznarski,113 AD3d 166 [3rd Dept 2013], citing Dictionary.com [Dictionary.com Unabridged, Random House, Inc.]). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:09 am by PaulKostro
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) Mr Ahmed had applied to Tower Hamlets (oddly named as ‘Hamlets’ in the reported judgment) as homeless. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:43 am by jonathanturley
In what was billed as a major address yesterday by the White House, President Joe Biden declared that, if the Democrats prevail in the midterm elections, “here’s the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Wilson wrote, in explaining why crime continued to fall (even during the Great Recession, when standard liberal theory says it should rise)(emphasis added):One obvious answer is that many more people are in prison than in the past. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:49 pm
In her state of the state address today, Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle had this to say about the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am by Patricia Hughes
There is no reason for selecting the five year limitation, which has no relationship to the connection people have to Canada (people living abroad may have close connections, people living in Canada may actually have little) and which is not indicative of the impact of Canadian laws on Canadians, whether living elsewhere or not. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am by Christa Culver
  This set of petitions covers issues such as disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act, the types of standardized testing accommodations required for people with disabilities, and the Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]