Search for: "People v. Profit"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
” Thus, writes Bluntschli: even if the reprinting of a work by a third person, without the authorisation of its author, were not to cause financial loss to the latter and were perhaps even to secure him profits, this would still be a violation of the author’s rights, for no one has the right to make the author speak to the public against his will, that is, to expose a part of his personality, his name, and his author’s honour to the community. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 am
And if there’s any entitlement in war consumption, perhaps it lies with the defense contractors who have profited mightily from the destruction of assets. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
(Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
(Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Most people would note that copyrighted works show a remarkable consistency in pricing: iTunes, for example, has a very narrow range of prices for digital song downloads. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Don’t they profit more when risk is high? [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
The sheer audacity of trying to profit from information learned in such a confidential environment shocked the jurors – and McGee may spend some time in federal custody as a result (sentencing is set for February 13; United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 6:49 pm
The case, People v Bylsma, arose out of Kent County and is distinctive because it is the first case under the Act that involves a collective grow operation.Ryan Bylsma was a certified care provider under the MMMA. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Since the last inquiry almost 8 years ago, much has changed in the digital environment, for example, the ease, speed and format in which people are sharing copyright content (Pinterest anyone?). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 4:27 am
New York State Off. of Victim Servs. v Raucci, 2012 NY Slip Op 04440 [97 AD3d 235], Appellate Division, Third Department, Motion before the Court of Appeals for Leave to Appeal Granted, Slip Opinion No: 2012 NY Slip Op 84607 The Court of Appeals will consider the appeal of Steven C. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:24 pm
The Seventh Circuit decision was of potentially major significance, because it marked the first time that a federal court at that level had accepted — at least temporarily — the argument that a profit-making company owned and run by people of strong religious faith fully shares their right to protection of their religious principles. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:51 am
SEC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:51 am
SEC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
If many people find it convenient, enjoyable, or profitable to do things that hurt animals, those things are not legally cruel. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:04 am
In Petrocelli v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
v=XCbPFHu3OOc. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 6:06 pm
Perhaps someone read the Disney v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 12:59 am
Statism v. [read post]
