Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2801 - 2820 of 178,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 9:48 am by Julia E. Palermo
Pure Radiance, Inc. affirmed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for a defendant and dismissing the plaintiffs Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claims because the plaintiff could not show that he suffered an ascertainable loss where he never used the product and his allegations were not supported by facts. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:48 am by Julia E. Palermo
Pure Radiance, Inc. affirmed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for a defendant and dismissing the plaintiffs Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claims because the plaintiff could not show that he suffered an ascertainable loss where he never used the product and his allegations were not supported by facts. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:48 am by Julia E. Palermo
Pure Radiance, Inc. affirmed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for a defendant and dismissing the plaintiffs Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claims because the plaintiff could not show that he suffered an ascertainable loss where he never used the product and his allegations were not supported by facts. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The plaintiff also threatened to sue defendant's owner personally, even to embroil the owner's parents into the matter. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:24 pm by Sean Wajert
(That is, he recalculated the study's conclusions so as to serve plaintiff's litigation needs, said the court.) [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:23 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Issuing a final blow, the district court denied Wal-Mart’s argument that the plaintiffs in Brown lacked standing using a bit of wordplay: “In a final ironic twist, Wal-Mart digresses from its tirade against sitting and takes a swipe at standing. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:15 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you are the victim of Massachusetts product liability, call the Law Offices of Jeffrey S. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
 But there’s somewhere else that plaintiffs might get with such an argument – into federal court. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:03 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Last week, the MDL judge ordered all incoming plaintiffs to complete a Plaintiffs Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ). [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:45 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Plaintiffs lawyers are seeking an MDL for lawsuits against Sony over PlayStation's network data breach. [read post]
On August 19, 2024, the CFPB filed its reply brief in support of the CFPB’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce (Fort Worth Chamber) for lack of standing and, if granted, transfer the case to the Federal District Court for D.C. in the lawsuit challenging the CFPB’s credit card late fee final rule (“Rule”).... [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
The court noted that, to the contrary, the Plaintiffs counsel’s lack of due diligence was apparent in the case and the Plaintiffs attorney’s “attempt to blame the COVID-19 pandemic as the cause of the lack of timely service is [was] misplaced. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:27 am
Jan. 31, 2007) In this case, plaintiff alleged that its former employees improperly used plaintiff's computers, confidential information and trade secrets to divert business from plaintiff to defendants. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Rumours circulated afterwards that the plaintiff was a thief and that he stole $2,000 of another player’s money. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
Prager opened the stairwell's door minutes later, the group was no longer there, but he saw plaintiff's blood on the ground at the bottom of the stairs and plaintiff being helped to the nurse's office by a security guard. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:17 am
 The District Court also found that the evidence plaintiff submitted with respect to defendant’s profit did not identify which portion of that revenue was attributable to the games that infringed plaintiff’s mark. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:03 pm by Patricia Salkin
   The district court issued two opinions that were appealed: the first opinion adjudicated a motion to dismiss, and dismissed as unripe Plaintiffs claims arising from the prohibition and removal of Plaintiffs religiously symbolic structures from the subject property; the second opinion denied in part and granted in part Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, specifically, the court declined to enter an… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:38 pm by Pilar G. Kraman
Judge Robinson, therefore, granted plaintiffs motion striking defendant’s invalidity defense as to that patent. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:18 am by emagraken
In a good demonstration of the Court’s discretion following a trial where a Plaintiff does not beat a pre-trial defence formal settlement offer, reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, taking a Plaintiffs post offer costs and disbursements away but not requiring the Plaintiff to pay the Defendant’s costs and disbursements. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:00 am by Doug Austin
Judge Mannion denied the defendant’s request for attorney’s fees and costs for “the time and effort it was forced to expend in an effort to obtain discovery”. [read post]