Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 2801 - 2820 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm by axd10
Brian Richard, Application of International Humanitarian Law by United States Courts, 28 PENN STATE INT’L L. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Jackson, in his famous Veto of the bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States declared first that “Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority…. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am by Susan Brenner
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), which I’ve discussed in prior posts.In Kyllo, federal agents who suspected Danny Lee Kyllo was growing marijuana in hishome in a triplex, . . . used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consistent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
The initiator of the debate on this topic at the Hugh Laddie Lecture was IPKat friend, Richard Ashmead (picture, right). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:49 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Wednesday, February 15 Criminal Justice: The United States Sentencing Commission will begin a two day hearing to discuss federal sentencing since the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Dowding v The Character Group PLC 19 and 20 June 2024 (Richard Spearman KC) Codnor v Thorpe,  17 June 2024 (Richard Spearman KC). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
It was also settled before the case could be heard by a jury at the state level. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Vance Spath called to order the military commission in the case of United States v. [read post]