Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES" Results 2801 - 2820 of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
Representative Publications: Brewer, Scott. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
I heard some grumbles because the organization was initially named the “United States Trademark Association” and therefore the formation question could be misinterpreted. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
John Marshall (the third Chief Justice): If the government of the United States “were to make a law not warranted by any of the powers enumerated, it would be considered by the judges as an infringement of the Constitution which they are to guard. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:26 am by Jeff Gamso
This section does not confer upon any person a right to appeal or modify any decision in a criminal proceeding, does not abridge any other right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or this constitution, and does not create any cause of action for compensation or damages against the state, any political subdivision of the state, any officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any political subdivision, or any officer of the court. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Senate adopted a unanimous resolution in March 2015 which states, among other things, that the IoT “has the potential to generate trillions of dollars in economic opportunity” and that the United States should “develop a strategy to incentivize development of the IoT for connected technologies to empower consumers, foster future economic growth, and improve collective social well-being…” If these and similar efforts gain traction in… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Scott Greenfield (Simple Justice) says that videotaping confessions may help: But it most assuredly won’t be an ironclad guarantee that false confessions won’t happen. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]