Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 3,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
By Scott Cameron United States copyright law saves for the copyright owner the exclusive right to distribute copies of his copyrighted work. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
I am licenced in the State of New York and all Federal courts, and Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:07 am
Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Clemmer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
The Federal District Court authorized an attorney and the assistance of mental health experts, pointing out that the Texas state courts had not complied with the basic due process that the United States Supreme Court required in another Texas case - that of Scott Panetti, a mentally ill death row inmate with a 20 year history of schizophrenia, who was permitted to represent himself at trial dressed in a purple cowboy costume. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 3:10 am
From the abstract: This Article presents newly discovered archival evidence demonstrating that government lawyers told a crucial lie to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Hirabayashi v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:05 pm
Any change in Riles' case or state law could have a direct effect on many Texas inmates.The Supreme Court ruling referenced is the 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Brokerage - Residential 3 stuart adler ASG Real Estate/MB Housing Broker 3 Acheson Doyle Partne Acheson Doyle Partners Architecture 3 scott wechsler WeMac Ventures LLC Development - Brokers 3 robb pair harlem lofts Inc RE investor 3 David Atlas Homebuyers Brokerage - Residential 2 Jon-Bentley Wiggins Kamenitzer Real Estate Group Commercial Broker 3 Regina Wierbowski Regina Wierbowski Real Estate Broker 3 Lynn Tesser Pridential Douglas Elliman … [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Nothing binds the United States to the rest of the world, and we need not adhere to the same set of rules that we demand others apply. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
Scott, Intergovernmental Organizations as Disseminators, Legitimators, and Disguisers of Hegemonic Policy Preferences: The United States, the International Whaling Commission, and the Introduction of a Moratorium on Commercial WhalingJörn Griebel & Milan Plücken, New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
By Scott Cameron The United States Government, which created the courts and a legal system to provide an avenue to seek redress for injury, is immune from suit in that system unless the Government agrees to be sued by waiving its immunity. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
by Scott D. [read post]
