Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 33,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 4:06 pm
I should say that it's taken me a long time to warm up to the blogging idea. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
Here is an interesting exchange (read also the comments) between Peter Singer (Princeton) and Michael Berube (Penn State), whose child has Down's Syndrome. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:15 am
On March 30, 2009, Judge Lawrence M. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Galanis bought a pizza business from the Panagiotidises (hopefully that’s then correct way to pluralize—I’m stumped). [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 9:21 am
Unlike the previous two models which focus on documents, Arizona's Archival Model focuses on preserving certain sections of a state agency's web site. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:42 pm
He argues that he is “not interested in just splitting the difference” when he habitually seeks a consensus on tough issues. “There are some times where we need to be less bipartisan,” he says. “I’m not interested in cheap bipartisanship. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:59 am
The Governor of Michigan, Jennifer M. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:33 pm
And there’s some evidence that citizens prefer to have government experts make decisions, so long as they’re not acting solely in their own interests but have the public welfare in mind. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
That’s right—I’m talking about cannabis. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:40 am
Leesa M. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 2:44 pm
The opinion includes interesting discussion of the issues surrounding the warranty statement. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:05 pm
Bell wrote the court's opinion in _Janice M. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:58 am
Second, since the enforcing court was a federal court, it’s also not clear whether a Chinese court will deem a state court’s judgment enforceable in China. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
I’m confused. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:48 am
There are some interesting jurisdictions in South America. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
The Associated Press argued that the law “violated the public’s right of access to court records” under the State Constitution, and that it was an impermissible restraint on freedom of speech per the State and Federal Constitutions. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:45 am
Thus, given the State's valid interest in identifying the father more easily when the child is born during the marriage for child support purposes, and its equally sound interest in requiring more than a shared intent before legally changing the parental relationship between parent and child, the Court concluded that the distinctions drawn by the Legislature in the Parentage Act are constitutional. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Today, I’m pleased to report that there are some open positions at the State Bar—jobs—and that you and your circle may be interested. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 7:03 am
DeMatteis: I had an interesting consultation this week, and I’m hoping that you can shed some light for our Connecticut viewers on how to answer this question. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Slocum (Florida State University, College of Law) has posted Major Questions, Common Sense? [read post]
