Search for: "State v Matthews" Results 2801 - 2820 of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
There was also an extension application by the Claimant and an application by the Defendant for strike out and/or summary judgment before HH Lewis in the case of Matthews v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council KB-2023-002991. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:51 am by Don Cruse
Opinions A school cannot moot a student's lawsuit merely by announcing a policy change COTI MATTHEWS, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILD M.M., ET AL. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Times, Matthew Parris complains that Lord Puttnam “has led a sneak attack to sabotage the Defamation Bill and get statutory regulation by the back door“. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
V: Conclusion Though there is disagreement on the severity and degree of the alleged constitutional crisis, it is uncontested that significant hurdles remain in any scheme to raise the judiciary's pay. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:45 am by Michael Wysocki
  The more evidence presented on the obligor’s abilities to support, resources of the obligor, assets available for support, assets that could produce income, and the proven needs of the children – the better chance you have at getting the deviation your client needs. [1] Matthews v. [read post]