Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 2801 - 2820 of 8,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
See Weil and Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2012) §8:1537 citing Browne v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:01 am by Dale Carpenter
Along the way, he offers sharp insights into the politics, ironies, and strategies behind the Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:12 am
It noted that the same exclusion was previously found not to violate public policy in the case of Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost suggests that, although the Court is “unlikely to be unanimous” if and when it reviews a challenge to state bans on same-sex marriage, “the gay rights ruling that now seems only a matter of time may well strike future generations just as Brown [v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Cabrales and State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Venkat
CareFlite Accessing an Employee's Facebook Posts by "Shoulder Surfing" a Coworker's Page States Privacy Claim -- Ehling v. [read post]