Search for: "State v. Cash " Results 2801 - 2820 of 5,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Here are several stories that did not warrant a full post, or that were so well done by another blogger that there was no point in recreating the wheel: The Federal Circuit upheld Judge Coar's preliminary injunction in Abbott v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:51 am by Doug Cornelius
The United States Government forced online poker sites to the fringes of the financial system. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed in Time, Tim Shriver, the chairman of the Special Olympics, weighs in on Moore v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:35 am by Susan Brenner
“[O]ne victim paid $1200 in cash fees, another paid over $2000. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:16 am by Larry
They show the truth of the old adage that bad facts make bad law.The first is United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In November 2012, the school district adopted a resolution stating that it was going to issue two million dollars in working cash bonds. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:30 am by The Health Law Firm
  While there are no Stark prohibitions on self-referral for non-Medicare reimbursed services, many states have their own laws that prohibit these referrals.Stark Law Compliance is a Two-Way Street.Stark II compliance is a two-way street. [read post]