Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 2801 - 2820
of 6,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
LXBN This Week Ep. 3: Facebook’s IPO, Oracle v. Google, POM’s “Juice Wars” and U.S. v. Roger Clemens
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm
And lastly we have the second go-around in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:21 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am
Davis v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:53 am
Davis stated that this was J & D's only wrecker. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
Davis, 480 So.2d 625, 627 (Fla.1985); see also Webb, 899 So.2d at 346; Taylor Woodrow Homes Fla., Inc. v. 4/46-A Corp., 850 So.2d 536, 542 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Lopez-Infante v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
Examining the Supreme Court’s most significant ruling on a claim of innocence based on new, post-trial evidence — Herrera v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
Commentary on last week’s arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly held that the alleged instructional error was harmful and that Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
Illum v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant for breach of contract, an account stated, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 713-14 (1976), with Kallstrom v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:53 pm
This post in our Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series discusses the Montana Supreme Court’s consideration of an insurer’s duty to defend in National Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Tamburo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am
The data, apparently obtained with a phone company’s help, led to a warrantless search of the motor home and the seizure of incriminating evidence.The majority opinion held that there was no constitutional violation of the defendant’s rights because he “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone.”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United… [read post]
