Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 2,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Roper v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
The panel’s decision last Jan. 5 in the case of Al-Bihani v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:47 am
" Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit stated that, the "requirement largely eliminates the ability of California almond producers to sell raw almonds, and therefore harms those producers' economic well being. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:04 am
Kavanaugh. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:03 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:23 pm
Kavanaugh, and David S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Judge Griffith wrote the opinion for the court in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:17 am
I have no firm opinion on the standing question, but the concurrence’s substantive analysis seems correct to me, especially given Marsh v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:18 am
., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
The case, Saleh et al v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:38 pm
Pearlstein relies on the recent Comcast v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:03 am
Kavanaugh and was joined by U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
In his dissent in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
State court certified copies of computer printouts of entries reflecting the defendant’s prior criminal convictions was presumptively reliable under FRE 803(8); the mere possibility of error in the computer records was insufficient to challenge their reliability, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:29 am
In October, in Watermeir v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Circuit released its opinion in Al Bihani v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
Kavanaugh. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:59 am
In a case brought by SoundExchange, DC Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh did opine that the challenge to the CRB judges "raises a serious constitutional issue. [read post]
