Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
That provision states that "the Court of Appeal will seek to take into account the fact that a case was in the Shorter Trials Scheme... [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 9:37 am
Instead, they have been left in a rather uncertain state. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
“[V]ery serious violent offences” can outweigh an Art 8 claim “even if they were committed by a minor”. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:42 pm
More pithily, Lord Hoffmann noted in Merrell Dow [1996] RPR 76 noted that “An invention is a piece of information. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
A predecessor to section 41(3) was upheld by the High Court on the grounds that the Oireachtas was entitled to conclude that significant resources would unfairly distort the political marketplace in favour of larger parties, well-established interest groups and major candidates with deep pockets, and against the interests of smaller parties or interest groups and minor candidates lacking in similar resources (Colgan v IRTC [2000] 2 IR 490, [1999] 1 ILRM 22, [1998] IEHC 117 (20 July 1998)),… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) ?? [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Al-Ameri (FC) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2004) UKHL 4 also offered some support for Mr R, in Lord Bingham’s view that a choice between destitution and another option was not a choice at all. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
This state of affairs is problematic for two reasons. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
One need not even mention Bush v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Lord Tomlin firmly and unequivocally rejected the very approach that, it will be seen, has won favour with the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 12:57 am
I have seen no justification for the alteration of the Faculty of sufficient weight to justify altering the current state of affairs. [28]. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Lord knows.The Seventh Circuit has now chimed in on a related issue.In Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
The Court of Appeal, not known for its strong language, lambasted those same insurers in Lord Justice Longmoor’s judgment which states ‘The facts of this case have revealed that the insurers exhibit an insouciance to their obligations under the Directive and the Regulations which leaves one quite breathless. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
The Court of Appeal, not known for its strong language, lambasted those same insurers in Lord Justice Longmoor’s judgment which states ‘The facts of this case have revealed that the insurers exhibit an insouciance to their obligations under the Directive and the Regulations which leaves one quite breathless. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 70:219 (4th ed. 1990). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
