Search for: "State v. Townes" Results 2801 - 2820 of 5,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Payments in contemplation of retirement excluded in determining an individual’s final average salary for purposes of retirement Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897 The Employees’ Retirement System member commenced service with the Town and served as its police chief from 1996 until his retirement in 2002. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
Therefore, we advise the Board of Governors that it should accord marital status to its employees who were lawfully married in Massachusetts under the ruling of that state's highest court in Goodridge v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
In my FindLaw column appearing today, I discuss the recent Supreme Court decision in Herring v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Matt Murphy
” That’s the first line from Justice Kennedy’s plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:51 am
Accordingly, said the court, the retired police officers lacked a legally protected property interest to the health insurance benefits available to active City police officers under the controlling collective bargaining agreement.Noting that §243.303 provides that “A local government must make health insurance coverage available to retirees only if the government offers such coverage to current officers and employees,” the Circuit Court held that such a provision did not bar a… [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am by Rich Vetstein
If you are selling your home, you cannot close without a passing Title V inspection of your septic system, completed by an inspector who is licensed by the state and your town. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Analyzing the key rules as well as the approach taken towards confidentiality and privacy in arbitration, Lusungu Mtonga, University of Cape Town. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:00 am
The “personnel records” exemption set out in Civil Rights Law §50-a (1) applies to both active and former employees of the agency Hearst Corp. v New York State Police, 2013 NY Slip Op 03900, Appellate Division, Third Department Supreme Court dismissed the Hearst Corporation’s [Hearst] appeal of an administrative decision denying its Freedom of Information [FOIL] request for “all records” maintained by the Division of State Police… [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:41 pm by Timothy B. Lee
In a Monday court filing for the case formally known as Ingenuity LLC v. [read post]