Search for: "Strange v. Strange" Results 2801 - 2820 of 3,726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
The OHIM’s approach has been supported in BMI Bertollo Srl v OHIM, in which a national application in Italy which listed the headings of several classes was deemed to cover all goods and services which compromised those classes.5. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:09 am
But it comes darn close, and not only reverses the trial court's dismissal, but its holding and analysis makes it very likely that the statute gets found unconstitutional on remand.It's a somewhat strange -- and yet understandable -- statute. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Strange things are afoot with respect to the Internet presence of the Consumer Product Safety Commission ("CPSC"). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm by admin
[He once shot bullet holes into the wall in the shape of a V, in honor, he said of Queen Victoria – Ed.]. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:46 am by Venkat
"  Kevin Thompson ("FTC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
At para.15 of his judgment Sedley LJ quotes him:"In Vodafone v Orange [1997] FSR 34 Jacob J, invited by consent to find the single meaning of words sued on for malicious falsehood, said:"As a comparative stranger to this branch of the law I find the "one meaning rule" strange, particularly for malicious falsehood. [read post]
30 May 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
  Although this happens every day in criminal cases the position in civil law is strangely and mysteriously different. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:28 pm by Gene Quinn
To some this may seem strange because in most areas of law the statute of limitations is 2 or 3 years, which means if you have a grievance you need to bring that grievance to the forefront within that length of time or you are barred from recovering. [read post]