Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:34 am
A legislated prohibition on these practices is the only way to protect the public. 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:05 am
In Philip Abi-Najm, et. al, v Concord Condominium, LLC, several condominium purchasers sued Concord under for breach of contract, breach of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) and for fraud in the inducement based upon flooring that Concord installed that was far from the quality stated in the purchase contract. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:17 am
Teller v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Schmidt, 2014 ONSC 1474 (Chttp://canlii.ca/t/g62sf -> Employee fired for accessing personal health Information Health Sciences Association of Sask v SAHO 2014 CanLII 9578 http://t.co/t7ayO64SFO -> Printout of Facebook page electronic document admiitted into evidence R v Nde Soh, 2014 NBQB 20://canlii.ca/t/g50jc -> Court gags Dotcom bodyguard – National – NZ Herald News http://t.co/kuDeuOOjlF -> No invasion of privacy to post photo of mural… [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
Starbucks didn’t and is not taking any legal action and the pop up shop has been dissolved, so this discussion is purely hypothetical. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
The legislature may previously have been concerned over protecting the public so that it is not misled by inappropriate collective marks but, in reality, the public is a far more sophisticated consumer with the knowledge and awareness that trade marks are not exclusively used by the trade mark owner. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:27 pm
Part I: Cool Things v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
Reasonable viewers, however, wouldn’t think that this billboard criticizing Louisiana Gov. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:49 am
Citing to Henrickson v. eBay and Corbis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm
Centro Tepeyac v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
Moving & Storage, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:19 am
Garden Catering-Hamilton Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Wake-up calls?) [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Finally, we have West Virginia, which didn’t need no stinkin’ safe harbors to exempt all FDA-approved products from its state’s consumer protection statutes. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
However, that issue wasn’t teed up in this case. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:15 am
Code § 1125(a); and violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Colorado Revised Statutes § 6–1–105. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
See, Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
But the same notion of consumer ability to self-protect/make meaning can also be used in product markets, as w/Sheff’s data and the many Tiffanys in the world. [read post]
