Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 2801 - 2820 of 11,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
No one should spend four years behind bars just because they can’t pay a bond to be free. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:47 am by Derek T. Muller
Students, of course, can have high quality employment outcomes in state court clerkships, public interest jobs, and government. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:47 am by Derek T. Muller
Students, of course, can have high quality employment outcomes in state court clerkships, public interest jobs, and government. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:29 am by Mark Tabakman
  The Court stated that a two-step test should be utilized to determine if preemption was appropriate. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Matt C. Bailey
The Order imposes the strictest of penalties – barring Judge Klein from holding judicial office in the state of California and from receiving an assignment, appointment, or reference of work from any California state court. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:34 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Hensler, supra, at 22 [stating that for facial challenges the limitations period would run from “the date the statute becomes effective,” which under California Planning and Zoning Law is normally 30 days after adoption for local ordinances].) [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:02 pm
Neither was controlling on Blanco, since in California intermediate appellate courts from different districts may (and often do) disagree with each other.Blanco's rationale is: (1) PMA approval imposes preemptive, device specific federal requirements; (2) state common-law actions impose requirements that may be preempted; and (3) the plaintiffs' claims - negligent manufacturing (no claim of FDCA violation was made), negligent warning, strict liability - would… [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm by Scott Schaefers
 While such noncompete agreements are normally void and unenforceable under California’s well-known statutory bar against employee noncompetes (see Cal. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:12 pm by Richard Burt
Lack of General Awareness by Most Lawyers Last year, I conducted a webinar on this new LLC law (jointly sponsored by the state bar’s Partnerships and LLC Committee and the Corporations Committee), and I have spoken and will speak at county bar associations on this topic as well. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:48 am by Michael Beckett, Esq.
Remke is currently the presiding judge of the State Bar Court, which is responsible for the discipline of attorneys. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:41 pm by Gary A. Watt
"  And then, "the clerk of this court is ordered to send a copy of this opinion to the California State Bar for consideration of discipline. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
  It’s been a time of great excitement for the Supreme Court bar. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:24 am by Joy Waltemath
On September 10, the California Legislation also approved a bill that should be on the radar of every attorney in the state. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:47 pm by The Justice Firm
  In total, up to 800 cases in California might be impacted by this new change to the state’s felony murder law. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:33 am
A recent opinion by the California Court of Appeals has ruled that it is an UNLAWFUL SEARCH AND SEIZURE when law enforcement sees a person smoking marijuana in their apartment and then enters the apartment and finds evidence of other drug crimes. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:41 am by Sheppard Mullin
D058825, D058669 (October 4, 2012) On October 4, 2012, the Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld a stipulated injunction which the trial court had concluded was an unlawful business restraint in violation of the law barring non-competition agreements, California Business & Professions Code section 16600. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:57 am by brbadmin
The California Senate will now have to sign off on the appointment of the State Bar of California’s executive director and general counsel. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:13 am by Hall Marston
Most California lawyers perceive a bright line between state and federal law when it comes to expert testimony, with federal law being more restrictive and California more lax. [read post]