Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 6,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 4:15 pm
Prioritized examination, known sometimes as “Track One,” has been in place at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the past 12 years. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:15 pm
Prioritized examination, known sometimes as “Track One,” has been in place at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the past 12 years. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:15 pm
Prioritized examination, known sometimes as “Track One,” has been in place at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the past 12 years. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:15 pm
Prioritized examination, known sometimes as “Track One,” has been in place at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the past 12 years. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:50 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled in a precedential decision Wednesday that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) was correct to affirm a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner’s finding that the claims of U.S. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:09 am
On March 19, 2013, Primera filed a petition for inter partes review of the '884 patent with the United States Patent and Trademark office. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 7:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and there remain many reasons to be hopeful about the year ahead. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:15 pm
Prioritized examination, known sometimes as “Track One,” has been in place at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the past 12 years. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:50 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled in a precedential decision Wednesday that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) was correct to affirm a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner’s finding that the claims of U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:50 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled in a precedential decision Wednesday that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) was correct to affirm a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner’s finding that the claims of U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:15 am
Supreme Court’s precedent in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:00 pm
It's been one year since the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its first "Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:28 am
In support of the inequitable conduct defense, Cepheid alleged that the patent prosecutor knowingly and intentionally failed to disclose to the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") material prior art during the prosecution of the patents. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:50 pm
Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:24 pm
” The “ ‘solicitations’ are constructed to [deceptively] make the trademark applicant believe that an official U.S. government agency or the [United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) ] itself is sending a letter to them, raising fear among the unsuspecting public that they must pay large amounts of money or forfeit trademark rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 5:20 pm
Secretary Locke Promises Strongest IP Protection in the WorldI am just getting back from two days at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, having attended the 14th Annual Inventors Conference. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
Trademark protection in the United States includes registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:11 pm
Is the United States patent system broken and does it need to be fixed? [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:42 am
On February 14, 2007, The United States Patent and Trademark Office (‘‘USPTO'') proposed amending 37 CFR 2.64 to require a request for reconsideration of an examining attorney's final refusal or requirement to be filed through the Trademark Electronic Application System (‘‘TEAS'') within three months of the mailing date of the final action. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Third party challengers can seemingly inflict stock-price drop through an efficient patent invalidation mechanism provided at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, while betting against the targeted company’s stock price. [read post]
