Search for: "United States Department of Commerce "
Results 2801 - 2820
of 5,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
Every 9 seconds a woman in the United States is beaten. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
Every 9 seconds a woman in the United States is beaten. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
Every 9 seconds a woman in the United States is beaten. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:36 pm
U.S. participants are to include leading members of the U.S. judiciary, U.S. government legal policy experts, and officials from the Departments of Commerce and Justice and the Office of the United States Trade Representative. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
Cameron Kerry, former general counsel of the US Department of Commerce, notes the robust oversight mechanisms that apply to the US intelligence community. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:20 am
In the early days of our nation, Chief Justice John Marshall—one of the greatest Chief Justices in American history—penned landmark rulings affirming the Constitution’s promise of access to courts, holding that the Constitution authorized the “judicial department” to “decide all cases of every description under the constitution or laws of the United States,” and imposed on the federal courts the obligation… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm
” The US-EU safe harbor scheme, administered by the US Department of Commerce, is supposed to satisfy this standard for participating companies. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:28 pm
The Court (Grand Chamber), therefore, ruled: that a decision such as Commission Decision 2000/520 on the adequacy of the protection provided by the safe harbor privacy principles issued by the US Department of Commerce does not prevent a supervisory authority of a Member State from examining the claim that the law and practices in force in the United States do not ensure an adequate level of protection; and That Decision 2000/520 is invalid. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:05 am
Department of Commerce as a framework that would allow US-based organisations to overcome the restrictions on transfers of personal data from the EU. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 10:08 am
Goss, P.C. is one of the few VA-accredited Veteran attorney firms in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:28 am
Is the authoritative root zone file, or other related materials or information, United States government property? [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
-EU Safe Harbor program” if they “comply with the Framework’s requirements,” “self-certify annually to the Department of Commerce” their intent to comply, and publicize that compliance in their “privacy policy statement. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:23 pm
In addition, the Department of Commerce revised the regulations governing the dolphin-safe label, requiring that all fisheries provide a certification that no dolphins were killed or seriously injured during the harvesting of tuna. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Pullman, and United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
International agreements could help reduce this dissonance, and rationalize surveillance rules to promote international commerce, law enforcement, protection of civil liberties, and the worldwide rule of law. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 10:01 pm
Mizer, principal deputy assistant attorney general of the United States, has weighed in on the Austin (Jack) and Peter DeCoster case, in which a trial court judge sentenced the two shell egg executives (who are father and son) to federal prison sentences of three months each. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
This was followed in 1991 by Executive Order 12770 which directed the Secretary of Commerce “to direct and coordinate efforts by Federal departments and agencies to implement Government metric usage. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
