Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
From Renna v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
Alavi seemed to have a pretty good argument under Dowling, but the prosecution fought back by citing the issue the Dowling Court didn’t address: The United States does not allege that the software Alavi allegedly exported was stolen merely because [he] infringed an exclusive right of the copyright holder. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
The court held that the conviction was consistent with the First Amendment, as applied in Holder v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
” However, entry to the United States under that statute is limited to two years. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Both the United States and Brazil have recently taken clear positions on the laws that regulate merchants charging different amounts for goods depending on the method of payment. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
Any attempt to answer this is necessarily speculative, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Holder v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The IP rights may or may not be transferred when an NFT changes hands depending upon the way the NFT is structured.In the United States, the general rule is an intellectual property right is not transferred unless the patentee, copyright owner, or trademark owner clearly states there is a transfer in a signed writing.Various federal laws govern this process. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am
Holder (2013). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm
Supreme Court ethics are in the news.The organization, "Common Cause," recently asked Attorney General Holder to investigate whether Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas should have recused themselves from Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:46 am
National Protest on DOMA—Michael Lehet (Flickr.com) When some constitutionally suspect classifications (race, religion, alienage, or national origin) are not at issue, nor are any fundamental constitutional rights at stake, a law must be upheld if there is any “reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification” (United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 10:20 pm
In Warshak v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:26 am
While in the Voting Section, she received the high honor of being invited by the United States Solicitor General to sit at counsel table during the Supreme Court argument in Reno v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm
(See, Campbell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
Malilia was not then eligible for relief, the judge ordered his removal from the United States and Mr. [read post]
